Laura Bies Posted January 6, 2021 Share Posted January 6, 2021 This news and analysis are provided by the Ornithological Council, a consortium supported by 10 ornithological societies. Join or renew your membership in your ornithological society if you value the services these societies provide to you, including OrnithologyExchange and the Ornithological Council. Yesterday, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service released its final rule changing the scope of the Migratory Bird Treaty Act, nearly a year after officially proposing the formal policy change. The new rule is based on a December 2017 Interior Department internal memo interpreting the MBTA to not apply to unintentional or incidental “take.” For decades, the bill had been applied to both intentional and incidental take. This final rule codifies in regulation the administration’s interpretation that the law only applies to the intentional take of birds. Last January, Interior formally proposed the rule change and issued a scoping notice for an environmental review of such a change. The OC submitted comments on the scoping notice in March. In June, a draft EIS was released. The OC commented on that draft, noting that the “analysis therein is not scientifically-credible to determine the effects of the Service’s proposed rule on migratory birds. For most species of birds protected under the MBTA, the Service does not have the information it needs to assess the impact of this proposed policy, nor does it currently have sufficient scientific resources to undertake the analyses needed.” In November, the final EIS was released, paving the way for this week’s final rule. While codifying the new interpretation makes it harder for the incoming Biden administration to undo, the rule will likely face legal challenges. An August court decision struck down the solicitor’s opinion and calls into question the legality of the rule itself. Legislative challenges are also possible. For example, Rep. Deb Haaland (D-N.M.), who President-elect Joe Biden has tapped for Secretary of the Interior, has co-sponsored a bill to reverse the Trump administration’s MBTA interpretation. ***** USFWS Press Release U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Finalizes Regulation Clarifying the Migratory Bird Treaty Act Implementation January 5, 2021 Contact(s):firstname.lastname@example.org Today, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) is publishing a final regulation that defines the scope of the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA). Consistent with the text, purpose and history of the MBTA, the final regulation clarifies that conduct resulting in unintentional (incidental) injury or death of migratory birds is not prohibited under the MBTA. This rule provides regulatory certainty to the public, industries, states, tribes and other stakeholders about implementation of the MBTA and best practices for conservation. “This rule simply reaffirms the original meaning and intent of the Migratory Bird Treaty Act by making it clear that the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service will not prosecute landowners, industry and other individuals for accidentally killing a migratory bird. This opinion has been adopted by several courts, including the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit,” said U.S. Secretary of the Interior David L. Bernhardt. “The Trump administration is committed to using science and the law as the foundation of our decisions at the Service,” said Aurelia Skipwith, Director of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. “Employing an open and transparent public process to finalize today’s action emphasizes our dedication to conservation of migratory birds and to providing regulatory certainty.” This final rule codifies the 2017 Department of the Interior Solicitor’s Office Opinion M-37050 to provide a uniform approach that incidental take of birds resulting from an activity is not prohibited when the underlying purpose of that activity is not to take birds. This is consistent with the interpretation of several federal courts, including a 2015 ruling by the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals. This final decision was informed by an open and transparent public engagement process that the Service managed throughout the development of the rulemaking process. Three separate 45-day periods were held for the public to address the rulemaking and submit comments. The public scoping process included six webinars, which were open to any members of the public, including members of federal and state agencies, tribes, non-government organizations, private industries and American citizens. The Endangered Species Act and the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act, as well as state laws and regulations, are not affected by the Solicitor’s Opinion M-37050 or the final regulation. This final rule will be effective 30 days after publication in the Federal Register. All the documents related to the rulemaking process and further information is available at https://www.fws.gov/regulations/mbta/. ***** About the Ornithological Council The Ornithological Council is a consortium of 10 scientific societies of ornithologists; these societies span the Western Hemisphere and the research conducted by their members spans the globe. Their cumulative expertise comprises the knowledge that is fundamental and essential to science-based bird conservation and management. The Ornithological Council is financially supported by our 10 member societies and the individual ornithologists who value our work. If the OC’s resources are valuable to you, please consider joining one of our member societies or donating directly at Birdnet.org. Thank you for your support! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.