Cara J Posted December 20, 2018 Share Posted December 20, 2018 In opposition to the federal government’s interpretation of the Migratory Bird Treaty Act, California is issuing its own legal guidance, affirming that “California law continues to provide robust protections for birds.” In December 2017, the Interior Department changed its interpretation of the act, issuing an opinion that the MBTA does not apply to unintentional “take” of a protected bird. Previously, the MBTA was applied to instances of both intentional and unintentional take of migratory birds. In response, eight states, including California, filed suit, arguing that the new interpretation inappropriately narrows the MBTA and should be vacated. Now, California is taking its opposition one step further. Its new legal guidance specifies that state law includes “a prohibition on incidental take of migratory birds, notwithstanding the recent reinterpretation of the Migratory Bird Treaty Act” by Interior. The guidance notes that California courts have affirmed that state’s legitimate interest in protecting its fish and wildlife and that several different provisions in California law already prohibit take of migratory birds. In addition, a bill now under consideration by California’s state assembly would explicitly protect migratory birds in California in light of Interior’s restricted interpretation of the MBTA. The MBTA was passed in 1918 and has [...] View the full article Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.