Cara J Posted June 15, 2016 Share Posted June 15, 2016 A rider in the House version of the Fiscal Year 2017 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) (H.R. 4909) that would undermine sage-grouse (Centrocercus urophasianus) conservation efforts continues to receive strong opposition despite being passed by the House last month. The rider, inserted into the language of NDAA by Rep. Bishop (R-UT), would amend 98 Bureau of Land Management and U.S. Forest Service land-use plans by giving states the ability to overrule federal conservation efforts in favor of state plans. The rider would also forbid the Secretary of the Department of Interior from changing the conservation status of sage-grouse under the Endangered Species Act (ESA) until Sept. 30, 2025. The provision has received pushback from both lawmakers and members of the Department of Defense. Opponents of the sage-grouse language argue that ESA already has a mechanism for preventing natural resource management plans from disrupting military preparedness, making this rider an unnecessary addition to the military spending bill. An identical version of this rider also passed the House last year as part of the Fiscal Year 2016 NDAA. However, the measure was not included in the Senate version of the bill and an amendment to add the language was ultimately withdrawn from consideration. [...] Read more: http://wildlife.org/concern-over-sage-grouse-language-in-military-bill-continues/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.